Denying the Holocaust

View other editions of Denying the Holocaust.
View books by Deborah E. Lipstadt.

Give Lipstadt her due! - Rated
This book is super. It details the history of holocaust denial including modern-day neo-nazism. It shows the Holocaust deniers for what the really are, and how under no circumstances should they be taken seriously. Deborah Lipstadt is Jewish and so this sometimes effects the content of her work, but this is obviously understandable; she clearly sees that the purpose of history is to learn by past mistakes of certain individuals. A great read the is highly recommended by me.

A better informed reader! - Rated
I came to this book having read Lively's book called the Pink Swastika,
which put a good case for believing that the real perpetrators of the Shoah
were not Germans raised by their parents as good Christians, but, as I read
it, atheist/pagan homosexuals. Upon reading Lively's book it seemed clear
that Nazism & in consequence the Shoah had little to do with Christianity,
as some have claimed, and the blame should rest with those who assert their
victim status: homosexuals. It therefore came as an interesting revelation
to read (a borrowed paperback copy of) Dr.Lipstadt's book, which made me
realise that the book I had just read was, in its own way, a perfect
example of denial. I now realise that the Shoah was the consequence of a
twisted ideology that borrowed some of its historic scapegoats from
Christian doxa and not, again as I read it, an anti-Christian homosexual
conspiracy! (As Lively is a Christian, one might call his work a legitimate
Faith Position). I also realise that there is perhaps a tendency in all of
us blame the victim and dissociate ourselves and especially our belief
system from contamination with that great leveller: evidence. What Lipstadt
should teach any reader is to investigate assertions, especially ones where
(as I now know) the citations themselves, are problematic.

This book should be compulsory reading for all first year university
students - though again, they should also be aware of disputes amongst
professional historians (as against amateurs) about precise details, but
that is a minor criticism coming from an imperfect reviewer!

Beyond Belief. Though They Died, The Hatred Lives On. - Rated
This is an excellent, much needed book, which combats what is described as a moral and intellectual virus being used to attack the extremely well documented, factual record of the Holocaust in which over six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis.

The book is extremely well written with both compassion and authority. It illustrates that despite the irrefutable evidence and clinical accuracy in which the Holocaust was meticulously documented and in which the genocide of the European Jews was pursued, there are still sources who would dispute that the Holocaust ever occurred or that it has been greatly exaggerated. An attitude which appears to increase in parallel with the present day's rising anti-Semitism.

It is made very clear in this book that very few historical events are as well documented as the Holocaust, yet few if any of these other events are questioned. Indeed, despite other genocides and slaughters having occurred throughout history, (with none having been as well documented as that of the Jews), none receive the denial and hostility afforded the Jewish Holocaust.

On page 22 the book cites a seeming "contradiction" where it outlines many instances where even the Nazi perpetrators of the Holocaust actually admitted the crimes that they committed, whilst a growing group who were not even present at the time claim that the perpetrators were innocent.

The book citing neo-Nazis who once argued that the Holocaust, however horrible, was justified now content that the entire event was a hoax. The latter being more expedient to furthering their cause, where the book alleges attempts are made to "rehabilitate the persecutors and demonise the victims".

The book addresses the issue of how Holocaust deniers are often afforded near celebrity status and their views given unbelievable credibility with a ready platform frequently being provided for the proponents by many elements of the media under the banner of free speech.

Many Holocaust deniers are described as often using the guise of scholarship to camouflage their anti-Semitic ideology. With the increase of anti-Semitism the book contends that the average uninformed person will find it increasingly difficult to discern the true objectives of the Holocaust deniers, who use arguments carefully designed to take advantage of the vulnerability & fragility of memory, truthfulness and reason. Indeed a number of public surveys are quoted in the book which reveal an alarming ignorance amongst the public in relation to the Holocaust, despite the wealth of material and information available.

The contents of the work show that for the first 40 years after the Holocaust, there was a sort of protective "Teflon" against blatant anti-Semitic expression. Now, due to the process of Holocaust denial, that protective covering has become eroded and society has moved from where anti-Semitism was a crime, past where anti-Semitism was classed as distasteful, to it now simply being another opinion. Something which the book declares will increase as the number of Holocaust survivors become less and less as the years progress.

My only criticism of this book is that, amongst the many areas/avenues of Holocaust denial studied, no attention is made to the Holocaust denial amongst the Arab nations in the Middle East. For those interested in the latter subject might I respectfully recommend Arieh Stav's book entitled "Peace: The Arabian Caricature: A Study of Anti-Semitic Imagery". Thanks for your time.

Revisionism and denial exposed for what they really are - Rated
As a former Kindertransportee I participate in Holocaust Education projects. As a psychotherapist I work with first, second and third generation Holocaust survivors. Yet until I read this book I was only aware of the need for Holocaust Education to combat general ignorance and reluctance to know about what happened. Lipstadt makes it very clear that growth of Holocaust revisionism and denial goes far beyond ignorance to threaten the very roots of reason and democracy and attacks the foundations of enlightened human culture.

She defines the difference between history, a rational discipline aiming to uncover and understand events, and revisionism (which she insists is denial), an irrational ideology based on and propagated by the creation of falsifications and distortion of facts. She demonstrates unequivocally how this ideology is based on a master-race philosophy and vitriolic hatred of Jews, Communists, etc. as inferior and conspiring against the master-race. Her account of the development of 'revisionism ' in response to WWI and the main characters that revived and extended it after WWII illustrates deniers' projection into 'the Jews' of their own disowned elements resulting in paranoid fear of them.

So powerful is the appeal of their irrational ideology that the deniers believe their own fabrications and live in a 'wonderland of mythology'. Jews, as the embodiment of moral values and truth, present a threat to their 'wonderland' and must be anihilated to 'purify' the master-race. Furthermore, the powerful appeal of mythology is a part of human make-up. Holocaust revisionists and deniers trade on this to sow the seeds of doubt with their perverted propaganda and make converts to their irrational fabrications.

Lipstadt draws attention to details of real evidence to counteract these seeds of doubt. But those already converted to Holocaust denial have entered the wonderland of its mythology and are immune to rational discourse. Lipstadt warns of the dangers of getting involved in dialogue with them as this gives them a platform for their propaganda and unwarrented validity as 'the other point of view'. She recommends vigilance and exposure of their lies and subterfuges.

The book itself provides the solution to the puzzle why David Irving could self-destructively sue Lipstadt and Penguin for libel in it. Irving was deluded into believing he could single-handedly convince the judge, journalists and readers of his ideology and make a 'killing' in converts. He lost the libel case but gained publicity. Hopefully the publicity for Lipstadt's book has been even greater.

R. B.

Intriguing and disturbing - Rated
So this is what the court case was all about. This is an intriguing and disturbing analysis of the deeply worrying phenomenon of Holocaust denial. A book everyone should read.