Brilliant - Rated 
Succinct and to the point. Written with wit and eloqunce. If Dawkins has a powerful right hook, Greyling simply knocks the opposition down with a few short jabs and then walks away without even rubbing his knuckles.
To see exactly how effective his arguments are, read the reviews below which give the book just one star, and see the logic that those reviews employ.
Everyone should read this book.
An excellent introduction with some original points. - Rated
This short but excellent book will make a fine addition to my collection. While this book may be short it is by no means lacking a punch, A C Grayling articulates himself clearly and gets straight to the heart of the issue at hand.
We start off by looking at whether or not religion is worthy of respect, of which, of course, the answer is no, the only thing that should be worthy of respect is whether a person is a decent human being. "It is time to reverse the prevailing notion that religious commitment is intrinsically deserving of respect."
We then move on to more harder issues such as the inculcation of children into religion and the fact that 3/4 of Church of England schools are primary schools. As Richard Dawkins would say, this is child abuse, forcing a choice upon them before they have the mental acuity in which to make a rational decision for themselves.
If you're looking for a nice introduction for the rational rejection of belief in supernatural entities of any kind, this is it.
A refreshing outlook. - Rated
I read this book in one sitting, not because it's very short but because it was amazing. Worlds apart from the sarcastic sneerings of writers like Dawkins with 'The God Delusion', 'Against All Gods' questions our inherent tendency to respect religious views simply because they are religious. His discussions of religion and morality and whether the two should be so closely linked is fascinating. I highly recommend this book to anyone with an interest in a different and perhaps controversial approach to religion.
Short but sweet - Rated
This is a tightly argued philosophical polemic against religion, but it is no less warm and accessible for that.
Grayling argues that we grow as a species through our human relationships. We do not need "antique superstitions" to be moral individuals, or lead fulfilling lives.
Moreover Grayling demonstrates that the atheist position - that of not having a belief in any Gods - is far warmer, more positive and altogether more enlightening than "spiritual" reliance on Middle Eastern myths.
I agree with an earlier contributor that the biggest gripe about the book is the price, given the volume of text (I read it all in one evening sitting). However, the argument is pure gold, and given what is at stake, that in itself is worth the cover price.
Another Dawkins flea - Rated 
Richard Dawkins complains about those who are like fleas on his back - seeking to make money out of his success. This book certainly falls into that category. Short (very short), it is nothing more than a collection of six small essays, put in nice packaging and sold to the faithful. I guess that this would not matter if the quality was good but this is by far the worst of the anti-God books currently riding on Dawkins back.
Right from the beginning Grayling uses straw man arguments "faith is a commitment to belief contrary to evidence an reason" being the first example on page 1. That is a definition of faith which no Christian theologian would share. The whole book is poorly written and inherently self contradictory.
Sometimes the arguments are just plain silly (and an embarassment for someone who claims to be a leading philosopher). For example the statement that no wars have been fought over rival theories of biology. Does this include creationsist theories? Does it include Hitlers belief that the Germans were biologically a better race than the Jews? Is he seriously saying that atheism has never motivated anyone to violence (try asking Stalin)?
His attempt to equate all religious people with suicide bombers, to claim that all religious people are de facto child abusers and his complete lack of understanding of religion (and his glorification in his own ignorance) means that this book is a cheap (although financially expensive) and nasty piece of propoganda. It will only appeal to those who already share Graylings faith. Fundamentalist atheists will love it (not least because it reassures them that they cannot be fundamentalists!), intelligent Christians will be bemused that someone can be so full of ignorance and hatred, and the majority of people will be bemused and wonder why such an insubstanial work got published at all. Perhaps Dawkins is right - there are those who are seeking to fleece the gullible and make money out of their beliefs?!
|
